Sore Losers?


Sports Illustrated Photo

I have a hard time understanding why people get so upset when a horse fails to win as an odds-on favorite. Are they upset with the horse because the horse did not live up to its potential? Or, are they upset with themselves because they once again backed a horse at such ridiculously low odds, only to find out the horse was not worthy of that much attention?

Sports Illustrated posted the following headline at their website after the Preakness: Oxbow upsets Orb to win 138th Preakness Stakes. Notice, the headline plays to the sallied emotions of the three-out-of-four people who backed a losing horse, not to the four percent who had the foresight to bet on Oxbow. Such is the thought process of the attention hungry media.

I did not wager on either Orb or Oxbow. I bet on Departing and Mylute, not because I thought they were the best horses in the race, but because they were the best Value Plays available. I failed to cash tickets on the race, but you do not see me crying in my beer. It was just another race, and as such it does not warrant any abnormal attention.


On a similar note: Look at the published The-Locksmith-Reportstatistics for The Locksmith Smart Plays, available at Look at the R.O.I. (return on investment). Now, can someone please tell me why any sane person would spend money on such a poor source of information?Horse_50x50

This entry was posted in Reviews and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s